FROM THE SERVANT GENERAL
RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX UNIONS – 3
January 10, 2015
Dutch, Belgian, German bishops, and now an American bishop. What do they have in common? They all speak well of same-sex unions. What else do they have in common? They are all in error.
Bp Lynch says, “I do not wish to lend our voice to notions which might suggest that same-sex couples are a threat incapable of sharing relationships marked by love and holiness and, thus, incapable of contributing to the edification of both the Church and the wider society.”
What are the errors in the above statement? First, same-sex relationships may be marked by human love but not true Christian love, because true Christian love is never apart from righteousness. Second, same-sex relationships cannot be marked by holiness, because by its very nature it is unnatural, aberrant, ungodly, and an abomination. Third, same-sex unions have nothing to contribute to the edification of both the Church and the wider society. How can the Church or right-thinking society be edified with wrongdoing, with evil, with something that at its core is diabolical? How can society benefit from the destruction of true marriage and traditional family life? Fourth, indeed same-sex unions are a threat, and a direct assault, on faith, family and life.
So, as Bp Lynch says is necessary, what “pastoral response faithful to Church teaching and marked by respect and sensitivity might be appropriate for same-sex couples”? To be faithful to Church teaching is to reject same-sex unions or same-sex marriage. To be pastoral and caring to those in such unions is to tell them the truth. They are in sin and their souls are in danger. It is not helpful to them for the Church to make them comfortable in their sin.
If we truly respected the human person as a child of God, saved by Jesus on the cross, then we would speak the truth to them, with the hope that they would repent of sin and amend their lives. If we are to be sensitive, let us not be sensitive just to feelings, not wanting to hurt the emotions of people. The truth hurts! What we must be sensitive about is the eternal situation of people, whom God wants to be with Him eternally in heaven.
Florida bishop suggests same-sex relationships can be ‘marked by holiness’
Two Florida bishops offered starkly diverging responses this week after their state judiciary redefined marriage.
While Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski reminded diocesan employees they could face termination if they publicly suggest support for same-sex “marriage,” St. Petersburg Bishop Robert Lynch suggested in a January 6 Tampa Bay Times column that homosexual relationships present no risk to the Church, and in fact can be Godly and elevate society and the Church.
“I do not wish to lend our voice to notions which might suggest that same-sex couples are a threat incapable of sharing relationships marked by love and holiness and, thus, incapable of contributing to the edification of both the Church and the wider society,” Lynch wrote.
He cited last fall’s controversial Extraordinary Synod on the Family, saying the Church must respond to a suggestion made at the synod to discern what “pastoral response faithful to Church teaching and marked by respect and sensitivity might be appropriate for same-sex couples.”
He opened the column by recounting Church teaching on marriage: that it consists of one man and one woman, and is sacramental, indissoluble, and open to life. He then shifted to emphasizing the need to “recognize that the reality of the family today, in all its complexities presents the Church with pastoral challenges as the Church strives to accept people in the specific circumstances of their lives and support and encourage them in their search for God and their desire to be members of the Church.”
Archbishop Wenski’s letter to employees reminded them about the about the archdiocese’s employment policy, which requires employees to witness to Catholic moral teaching in their personal life.
“Whatever the role in which you serve within the archdiocese, you publicly represent the Catholic Church and the archdiocese in everything you do and say,” he wrote. “Therefore it is important that you understand the Church’s position and are well informed.”
News media, activists, and bloggers noted the disparate messages offered by Wenski and Lynch.
“There’s controversy brewing within the Catholic Church over the legalizing of same-sex marriage,” noted a WTSP Tampa Bay report. And the homosexual activist group Human Rights Campaign published a piece with the headline, Which of These Catholic Voices Represents the Church’s Stance on Gay Couples?
New Ways Ministry, a dissident group claiming to advocate for homosexual Catholics, praised Lynch’s column. “Another bishop … has commented on the legalization of same-gender marriage in Florida, but this time he is seeking to calm the fear and hysteria fomented by the state’s other Catholic leaders,” their blog post read.
* * *